Исходное сообщение
"Брюс Перенс, соавтор определения Open Source, развивает конц..." Отправлено Аноним, 30-Дек-23 02:17
>и не отменяет того, что это ПО можно "украсть", несмотря на его открытость и всё же ваша "последовательность" вызывает вопросы - я просто процитирую https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. ЕЩЕ РАЗ it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software и еще от туда же The freedom to redistribute if you wish: basic requirements Freedom to distribute (freedoms 2 and 3) means you are free to redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere. Being free to do these things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay for permission to do so. + https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLRequi... However, if someone pays your fee and gets a copy, the GPL gives them the freedom to release it to the public, with or without a fee. + Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the software must pay me a fee and/or notify me? No. In fact, a requirement like that would make the program nonfree. If people have to pay when they get a copy of a program, or if they have to notify anyone in particular, then the program is not free. Повторюсь - либо программа свободна - либо НЕТ. поэтому "чё вы пишете" вообще не понятно-всё уже написано😉

Ваше сообщение
Имя*:
EMail:	Для отправки ответов на email укажите знак ! перед адресом, например, [email protected] (!! - не показывать email). Более тонкая настройка отправки ответов производится в профиле зарегистрированного участника форума.
Заголовок*:
Сообщение*:	>>и не отменяет того, что это ПО можно "украсть", несмотря на его открытость > и всё же ваша "последовательность" вызывает вопросы - я просто процитирую > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html > “Free software” means software that respects users' freedom and community. > Roughly, it means that the users have the freedom to run, > copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software. > ЕЩЕ РАЗ > it means that the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, > study, change and improve the software > и еще от туда же > The freedom to redistribute if you wish: basic requirements > Freedom to distribute (freedoms 2 and 3) means you are free to > redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either gratis or charging > a fee for distribution, to anyone anywhere. Being free to do > these things means (among other things) that you do not have > to ask or pay for permission to do so. > + > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic > However, if someone pays your fee and gets a copy, the > GPL gives them the freedom to release it to the public, > with or without a fee. > + > Does the GPL allow me to require that anyone who receives the > software must pay me a fee and/or notify me? > No. In fact, a requirement like that would make the program nonfree. > If people have to pay when they get a copy of > a program, or if they have to notify anyone in particular, > then the program is not free. > Повторюсь - либо программа свободна - либо НЕТ. > поэтому "чё вы пишете" вообще не понятно-всё уже написано😉
	Введите код, изображенный на картинке: