Интерактивная система просмотра системных руководств (man-ов)
perlsec (1)
>> perlsec (1) ( Solaris man: Команды и прикладные программы пользовательского уровня )
perlsec (1) ( Разные man: Команды и прикладные программы пользовательского уровня )
NAME
perlsec - Perl security
DESCRIPTION
Perl is designed to make it easy to program securely even
when running with extra privileges, like setuid or setgid
programs. Unlike most command line shells, which are based
on multiple substitution passes on each line of the script,
Perl uses a more conventional evaluation scheme with fewer
hidden snags. Additionally, because the language has more
builtin functionality, it can rely less upon external (and
possibly untrustworthy) programs to accomplish its purposes.
Perl automatically enables a set of special security checks,
called taintmode, when it detects its program running with
differing real and effective user or group IDs. The setuid
bit in Unix permissions is mode 04000, the setgid bit mode
02000; either or both may be set. You can also enable taint
mode explicitly by using the -T command line flag. This flag
is strongly suggested for server programs and any program
run on behalf of someone else, such as a CGI script. Once
taint mode is on, it's on for the remainder of your script.
While in this mode, Perl takes special precautions called
taintchecks to prevent both obvious and subtle traps. Some
of these checks are reasonably simple, such as verifying
that path directories aren't writable by others; careful
programmers have always used checks like these. Other
checks, however, are best supported by the language itself,
and it is these checks especially that contribute to making
a set-id Perl program more secure than the corresponding C
program.
You may not use data derived from outside your program to
affect something else outside your program--at least, not by
accident. All command line arguments, environment
variables, locale information (see the perllocale manpage),
results of certain system calls (readdir(), readlink(), the
variable of shmread(), the messages returned by msgrcv(),
the password, gcos and shell fields returned by the
getpwxxx() calls), and all file input are marked as
"tainted". Tainted data may not be used directly or
indirectly in any command that invokes a sub-shell, nor in
any command that modifies files, directories, or processes.
(Importantexception: If you pass a list of arguments to
either `system' or `exec', the elements of that list are NOT
checked for taintedness.) Any variable set to a value
derived from tainted data will itself be tainted, even if it
is logically impossible for the tainted data to alter the
variable. Because taintedness is associated with each
scalar value, some elements of an array can be tainted and
others not.
For example:
$arg = shift; # $arg is tainted
$hid = $arg, 'bar'; # $hid is also tainted
$line = <>; # Tainted
$line = <STDIN>; # Also tainted
open FOO, "/home/me/bar" or die $!;
$line = <FOO>; # Still tainted
$path = $ENV{'PATH'}; # Tainted, but see below
$data = 'abc'; # Not tainted
system "echo $arg"; # Insecure
system "/bin/echo", $arg; # Secure (doesn't use sh)
system "echo $hid"; # Insecure
system "echo $data"; # Insecure until PATH set
$path = $ENV{'PATH'}; # $path now tainted
$ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin';
delete @ENV{'IFS', 'CDPATH', 'ENV', 'BASH_ENV'};
$path = $ENV{'PATH'}; # $path now NOT tainted
system "echo $data"; # Is secure now!
open(FOO, "< $arg"); # OK - read-only file
open(FOO, "> $arg"); # Not OK - trying to write
open(FOO,"echo $arg|"); # Not OK, but...
open(FOO,"-|")
or exec 'echo', $arg; # OK
$shout = `echo $arg`; # Insecure, $shout now tainted
unlink $data, $arg; # Insecure
umask $arg; # Insecure
exec "echo $arg"; # Insecure
exec "echo", $arg; # Secure (doesn't use the shell)
exec "sh", '-c', $arg; # Considered secure, alas!
@files = <*.c>; # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)
@files = glob('*.c'); # insecure (uses readdir() or similar)
If you try to do something insecure, you will get a fatal
error saying something like "Insecure dependency" or
"Insecure $ENV{PATH}". Note that you can still write an
insecure system or exec, but only by explicitly doing
something like the "considered secure" example above.
LaunderingandDetectingTaintedData
To test whether a variable contains tainted data, and whose
use would thus trigger an "Insecure dependency" message,
check your nearby CPAN mirror for the Taint.pm module, which
should become available around November 1997. Or you may be
able to use the following is_tainted() function.
sub is_tainted {
return ! eval {
join('',@_), kill 0;
1;
};
}
This function makes use of the fact that the presence of
tainted data anywhere within an expression renders the
entire expression tainted. It would be inefficient for
every operator to test every argument for taintedness.
Instead, the slightly more efficient and conservative
approach is used that if any tainted value has been accessed
within the same expression, the whole expression is
considered tainted.
But testing for taintedness gets you only so far. Sometimes
you have just to clear your data's taintedness. The only
way to bypass the tainting mechanism is by referencing
subpatterns from a regular expression match. Perl presumes
that if you reference a substring using $1, $2, etc., that
you knew what you were doing when you wrote the pattern.
That means using a bit of thought--don't just blindly
untaint anything, or you defeat the entire mechanism. It's
better to verify that the variable has only good characters
(for certain values of "good") rather than checking whether
it has any bad characters. That's because it's far too easy
to miss bad characters that you never thought of.
Here's a test to make sure that the data contains nothing
but "word" characters (alphabetics, numerics, and
underscores), a hyphen, an at sign, or a dot.
if ($data =~ /^([-\@\w.]+)$/) {
$data = $1; # $data now untainted
} else {
die "Bad data in $data"; # log this somewhere
}
This is fairly secure because `/\w+/' doesn't normally match
shell metacharacters, nor are dot, dash, or at going to mean
something special to the shell. Use of `/.+/' would have
been insecure in theory because it lets everything through,
but Perl doesn't check for that. The lesson is that when
untainting, you must be exceedingly careful with your
patterns. Laundering data using regular expression is the
only mechanism for untainting dirty data, unless you use the
strategy detailed below to fork a child of lesser privilege.
The example does not untaint $data if `use locale' is in
effect, because the characters matched by `\w' are
determined by the locale. Perl considers that locale
definitions are untrustworthy because they contain data from
outside the program. If you are writing a locale-aware
program, and want to launder data with a regular expression
containing `\w', put `no locale' ahead of the expression in
the same block. See the SECURITY entry in the perllocale
manpage for further discussion and examples.
SwitchesOnthe"#!"Line
When you make a script executable, in order to make it
usable as a command, the system will pass switches to perl
from the script's #! line. Perl checks that any command
line switches given to a setuid (or setgid) script actually
match the ones set on the #! line. Some Unix and Unix-like
environments impose a one-switch limit on the #! line, so
you may need to use something like `-wU' instead of `-w -U'
under such systems. (This issue should arise only in Unix
or Unix-like environments that support #! and setuid or
setgid scripts.)
CleaningUpYourPath
For "Insecure `$ENV{PATH}'" messages, you need to set
`$ENV{'PATH'}' to a known value, and each directory in the
path must be non-writable by others than its owner and
group. You may be surprised to get this message even if the
pathname to your executable is fully qualified. This is not
generated because you didn't supply a full path to the
program; instead, it's generated because you never set your
PATH environment variable, or you didn't set it to something
that was safe. Because Perl can't guarantee that the
executable in question isn't itself going to turn around and
execute some other program that is dependent on your PATH,
it makes sure you set the PATH.
The PATH isn't the only environment variable which can cause
problems. Because some shells may use the variables IFS,
CDPATH, ENV, and BASH_ENV, Perl checks that those are either
empty or untainted when starting subprocesses. You may wish
to add something like this to your setid and taint-checking
scripts.
delete @ENV{qw(IFS CDPATH ENV BASH_ENV)}; # Make %ENV safer
It's also possible to get into trouble with other operations
that don't care whether they use tainted values. Make
judicious use of the file tests in dealing with any user-
supplied filenames. When possible, do opens and such after
properly dropping any special user (or group!) privileges.
Perl doesn't prevent you from opening tainted filenames for
reading, so be careful what you print out. The tainting
mechanism is intended to prevent stupid mistakes, not to
remove the need for thought.
Perl does not call the shell to expand wild cards when you
pass system and exec explicit parameter lists instead of
strings with possible shell wildcards in them.
Unfortunately, the open, glob, and backtick functions
provide no such alternate calling convention, so more
subterfuge will be required.
Perl provides a reasonably safe way to open a file or pipe
from a setuid or setgid program: just create a child process
with reduced privilege who does the dirty work for you.
First, fork a child using the special open syntax that
connects the parent and child by a pipe. Now the child
resets its ID set and any other per-process attributes, like
environment variables, umasks, current working directories,
back to the originals or known safe values. Then the child
process, which no longer has any special permissions, does
the open or other system call. Finally, the child passes
the data it managed to access back to the parent. Because
the file or pipe was opened in the child while running under
less privilege than the parent, it's not apt to be tricked
into doing something it shouldn't.
Here's a way to do backticks reasonably safely. Notice how
the exec is not called with a string that the shell could
expand. This is by far the best way to call something that
might be subjected to shell escapes: just never call the
shell at all.
use English;
die "Can't fork: $!" unless defined $pid = open(KID, "-|");
if ($pid) { # parent
while (<KID>) {
# do something
}
close KID;
} else {
my @temp = ($EUID, $EGID);
$EUID = $UID;
$EGID = $GID; # initgroups() also called!
# Make sure privs are really gone
($EUID, $EGID) = @temp;
die "Can't drop privileges"
unless $UID == $EUID && $GID eq $EGID;
$ENV{PATH} = "/bin:/usr/bin";
exec 'myprog', 'arg1', 'arg2'
or die "can't exec myprog: $!";
}
A similar strategy would work for wildcard expansion via
`glob', although you can use `readdir' instead.
Taint checking is most useful when although you trust
yourself not to have written a program to give away the
farm, you don't necessarily trust those who end up using it
not to try to trick it into doing something bad. This is
the kind of security checking that's useful for set-id
programs and programs launched on someone else's behalf,
like CGI programs.
This is quite different, however, from not even trusting the
writer of the code not to try to do something evil. That's
the kind of trust needed when someone hands you a program
you've never seen before and says, "Here, run this." For
that kind of safety, check out the Safe module, included
standard in the Perl distribution. This module allows the
programmer to set up special compartments in which all
system operations are trapped and namespace access is
carefully controlled.
SecurityBugs
Beyond the obvious problems that stem from giving special
privileges to systems as flexible as scripts, on many
versions of Unix, set-id scripts are inherently insecure
right from the start. The problem is a race condition in
the kernel. Between the time the kernel opens the file to
see which interpreter to run and when the (now-set-id)
interpreter turns around and reopens the file to interpret
it, the file in question may have changed, especially if you
have symbolic links on your system.
Fortunately, sometimes this kernel "feature" can be
disabled. Unfortunately, there are two ways to disable it.
The system can simply outlaw scripts with any set-id bit
set, which doesn't help much. Alternately, it can simply
ignore the set-id bits on scripts. If the latter is true,
Perl can emulate the setuid and setgid mechanism when it
notices the otherwise useless setuid/gid bits on Perl
scripts. It does this via a special executable called
suidperl that is automatically invoked for you if it's
needed.
However, if the kernel set-id script feature isn't disabled,
Perl will complain loudly that your set-id script is
insecure. You'll need to either disable the kernel set-id
script feature, or put a C wrapper around the script. A C
wrapper is just a compiled program that does nothing except
call your Perl program. Compiled programs are not subject
to the kernel bug that plagues set-id scripts. Here's a
simple wrapper, written in C:
#define REAL_PATH "/path/to/script"
main(ac, av)
char **av;
{
execv(REAL_PATH, av);
}
Compile this wrapper into a binary executable and then make
it rather than your script setuid or setgid.
See the program wrapsuid in the eg directory of your Perl
distribution for a convenient way to do this automatically
for all your setuid Perl programs. It moves setuid scripts
into files with the same name plus a leading dot, and then
compiles a wrapper like the one above for each of them.
In recent years, vendors have begun to supply systems free
of this inherent security bug. On such systems, when the
kernel passes the name of the set-id script to open to the
interpreter, rather than using a pathname subject to
meddling, it instead passes /dev/fd/3. This is a special
file already opened on the script, so that there can be no
race condition for evil scripts to exploit. On these
systems, Perl should be compiled with
`-DSETUID_SCRIPTS_ARE_SECURE_NOW'. The Configure program
that builds Perl tries to figure this out for itself, so you
should never have to specify this yourself. Most modern
releases of SysVr4 and BSD 4.4 use this approach to avoid
the kernel race condition.
Prior to release 5.003 of Perl, a bug in the code of
suidperl could introduce a security hole in systems compiled
with strict POSIX compliance.
ProtectingYourPrograms
There are a number of ways to hide the source to your Perl
programs, with varying levels of "security".
First of all, however, you can't take away read permission,
because the source code has to be readable in order to be
compiled and interpreted. (That doesn't mean that a CGI
script's source is readable by people on the web, though.)
So you have to leave the permissions at the socially
friendly 0755 level. This lets people on your local system
only see your source.
Some people mistakenly regard this as a security problem.
If your program does insecure things, and relies on people
not knowing how to exploit those insecurities, it is not
secure. It is often possible for someone to determine the
insecure things and exploit them without viewing the source.
Security through obscurity, the name for hiding your bugs
instead of fixing them, is little security indeed.
You can try using encryption via source filters (Filter::*
from CPAN). But crackers might be able to decrypt it. You
can try using the byte code compiler and interpreter
described below, but crackers might be able to de-compile
it. You can try using the native-code compiler described
below, but crackers might be able to disassemble it. These
pose varying degrees of difficulty to people wanting to get
at your code, but none can definitively conceal it (this is
true of every language, not just Perl).
If you're concerned about people profiting from your code,
then the bottom line is that nothing but a restrictive
licence will give you legal security. License your software
and pepper it with threatening statements like "This is
unpublished proprietary software of XYZ Corp. Your access
to it does not give you permission to use it blah blah
blah." You should see a lawyer to be sure your licence's
wording will stand up in court.
SEE ALSO
the perlrun manpage for its description of cleaning up
environment variables.